Mandatory Human Chip Implants Essay

The idea of compulsory gentle universe snick implants is wrong on so numerous different levels. non exclusively is on that point a major commercial enterprise about how it will affect the privateness of society, but also how much we feignt know about the inauspicious effects on the actual tender-hearted body. A nonher major concern is the man a sensthalash that corporation be expect from all religious bodies and communities. This is why we as a society must abide up for what we regard is decentlyeousness, and what is right is that mandatory military personnel chip implants cannot and will not be tolerated.One of the biggest issues with mandatory gentlemans gentleman chip implants is seclusion issues and concerns. M whatever questions direct add together up whenever the topic arises. What governing or body of government controls the selective learning stored from these chips? Is the information stored in the chip fail-safe and secure? Can my information be sto len and or sold? As of right now the scarce chip authorise for pieces in a medical examination exam application is the Verichip. The Verichip is a chip equal to the size of a grain of rice. It is a fairly simple device that consists of only a coiled wire and a hermetically sealed microchip inwardly a glass casing. It uses the coil as an antenna to create a radio receiver communicate that is unique. This unique signal can be transmitted and received to severalise a persons medical records if they are in some secern of dire state in which they could not communicate efficiently.(Foster, Kenneth R. 2007,March)This could save so many lives in the medical field barely by pulling up a patients records and receiving this signal. In a perfect world this would work mightily and only for good intentions but, the way we as a society constantly pass to streamline e actually aspect of our life, where would it resolution? The notion or idea is that it would deputise drivers licen ses or aver atm and debit cards. Social shelter numbers, birth certificates, bank account numbers, fundamentally your entire life. As technology continues to produce and advance, how secure can these chips sincerely be? If person was able to steal your signal they would be able to do so many functions with the information stored in it. Your life would be stolen in the b link of an eye. Also, another(prenominal) terrifying realization is if the signal is stolen or locked on to, you could be followed or tracked. This is very unsettling if we cannot be sure how safe this information really is. Would you really want some ane to know where you or your loved ones are at all times? What if some sick individual was watching your small fry or children? The possibilities are endless in these scenarios. So with no guarantee on how secure the information stored in these chips really is, this is one of the many reasons why on that point should not be mandatory charitable chip implan ts.Another strong lay out point on this overthrow is wellness concerns. With these devices being as small as they are, there is not enough entropy to prove that they are not a health concern. There is lots of data about these chips that should raise some eyebrows, as well as the manner in which they were approved by the FDA. Back in 2005 when the FDA approved human chip implants they claimed with well-founded assurance the device was safe. The one thing they failed to mention in that claim was that studies liberation back to the mid-nineties directly colligate these chip implants with cancer. Many studies and look for showed that one in six lab rats actual tumors because of the introduce chip. So how could this slip by the FDA you ask? According to Lewan (2007), well back in 2005 when it was brought before the FDA for approval, the head of the subdivision of Health and charitable Services at the time which presided over the FDA, was a man by the name of Tommy Thompson. W ell both weeks after the approval of the chip in human race, Thompson left his position at the DHHS to receive a board member of VeriChip Corp. and utilize Digital Solutions. Even though it was louver months later, he was compensated with cash and trite options from the companies. Can we chalk this up as a coincidence? I take upt think so. With all the facts and research done on this particular subject I find it hard to believe that the FDA did not come across any of this information before approving human chip implants. So with the data al get up in front of us claiming to link these chips with cancer in lab rats, can we honestly agree to be enter ourselves?Finally, the thought or notion of human chip implants would cause a spacious backlash in our religious communities. reasonable recently in Virginia, there was a public outcry against mandatory micro-chipping that caused the signboard of Representatives to vote on the subject matter. Krunkle , (2010) wrote, Del. objec tive L. borecole (R-Fredericksburg), the bills sponsor, is quoted verbalism My understanding Im not a theologian but theres a prophecy in the Bible that rates youll have to receive a mark, or you can neither bargain nor sell things in end times, Cole said. Some people think these electronic computer chips might be that mark.(p.1) In our society, religious belief is at times, a very moot and touchy subject matter amid religious communities. There will be millions of people who will become distraught if human chip implants become mandatory. Our verdant has so many different religious cultures that it would directly effect. Are we really ready for the consequences that will follow if this eventually happens?In conclusion, we as a society get to stand up to what we consider right from wrong. So is it wrong to make person have a chip implanted so they can buy or sell things in order for them to depart even though it goes against their religious beliefs? Or is it wrong for these chips to be approved for humans even though there is secure evidence that it could cause cancer. The answer is totally up to us. My conclusion is that yes, it is completely wrong. Not only does it violate our ethical privacy rights as human beings, it also causes so many concerns medically and spiritually. We cannot allow this to come to fruition. We have to stand up for ourselves and our beliefs and say no to mandatory human chip implants to protect our future generations to come.ReferencesFoster, Kenneth R (2007, March) The dark ethics of implanted chips. IEEE spectrum. Retrieved from http//pages.cs.wisc.edu/markhill/cs252/Spring2013/handouts/spectrum07_rfid_ethics.pdf Holtzman, David H (2008). Human ID chips get under my skin, BusinessWeek Online, 5-5(1). Krunkle, Frederick (2010). Human chips seen by some in Virginia House as device of antichrist, The Lewan, Todd (2007). Chip implants linked to sentient being tumors, The Washington stick out Washington Post