Thursday, February 7, 2019
Federal Laws Essay -- essays papers
Federal Laws The national governments stand on inclusion body is sensibly indistinct. There are federal laws that govern raising of chelaren with disabilities. However, they do non select inclusion, but only that a significant effort be made to find an inclusive placement. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act ( thinking) was amended in 1997. The term inclusion does not appear in the act, but does require that fryren with disabilities be educated to the maximum extent appropriate in the least(prenominal) restrictive environment, which is interpreted to mean the invariable education classroom. The intent of IDEA is to educate as many students with disabilities as possible in the regular education classroom (--, 2002.) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires that on the whole pass catchers of federal funds must provide equal education of each adapted handicapped child in its jurisdiction with people who are not handicapped. Those schools that r eceive federal funding must place the handicapped child in the regular education classroom unless it is demonstrated by the recipient that this type of education with the added use of supplementary aides and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily (Schultz 2001.) Court Cases Court decisions provide guidelines governing placement of the child with special needs under IDEA. There are many dally cases throughout the country involving challenges to placement of students in the least restrictive environment. In the case of Greer vs. Rome City School District in 1992 parents were contend against the placement of their daughter in a self-contained special education classroom. The district argued that the costs of providing services in the classroom would be to a fault high. The court ... ...d States of America Pearson Education Group, Inc. Barry, Janet & Wise, B.J. (1997). Fueling inclusion through applied science Students with disabilities can rise to new heights with assert ive technology Hornby, G. (1999). cellular inclusion or delusion Can one size fit all? Support for Learning 14 (4), p.152 Jones, M. Thorn, C., Chow, P., & Wild, C. (2002). Equifinality Parents and students attitudes towards a student-centered approach to integration. Education 122 (3), p.624 Norwich, B. (2002). Education, inclusion and individual differences Recognizing and resolving dilemmas. British Journal of Educational Studies50 (4), p.482 Perkins-Gough, D. (2003). learn all students. Educational Leadership 61 (2), p.92 Pi v ik, J., McComas, J., & Laflamme, M. (2002). Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional Children 69 (1), p.97
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment